Fred currently earns $9,000 per month. Fred has been offered the chance to transfer for three to five years to an overseas affiliate. His employer is willing to pay Fred $10,000 per month if he accepts the assignment. Assume that the maximum foreign-earned income exclusion for next year is $105,900.

1. How much U. S. gross income will Fred report if he accepts the assignment abroad on January 1 of next year and works overseas for the entire year?

Income Reported:

2. If Fred’s employer also provides him free housing abroad (cost of $20,000), how much of the $20,000 is excludable from Fred’s income?

Amount to be excluded:

2b. Suppose that Fred's employer has offered Fred a six-month overseas assignment beginning on January 1 of next year. How much U. S. gross income will Fred report next year if he accepts the six-month assignment abroad and returns home on July 1 of next year?

Income Reported:

c-1. Suppose that Fred’s employer offers Fred a permanent overseas assignment beginning on March 1 of next year. How much U. S. gross income will Fred report next year if he accepts the permanent assignment abroad? Assume that Fred will be abroad for 305 days out of 365 days next year.

Income Reported:

c-2. If Fred’s employer also provides him free housing abroad (cost of $16,000 next year), how much of the $16,000 is excludable from Fred’s income? Assume that Fred will be abroad for 305 days out of 365 days next year.

Acompany set up a petty cash fund with $800. the disbursements are as follows: office supplies $300 shipping $50 postage $30 delivery expense $350 to create the fund, which account should be credited? a. postage b. cash at bank c. supplies d. petty cash

The assumptions of the production order quantity model are met in a situation where annual demand is 3650 units, setup cost is $50, holding cost is $12 per unit per year, the daily demand rate is 10 and the daily production rate is 100. the production order quantity for this problem is approximately:

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.