subject
Business, 14.02.2020 19:01 xchnemymp

What reason might Temin give to support his argument that what happened to the economy following the crash of 1987 is evidence against the crash of 1929 being an important shock to the economy? A. Economic conditions were more severe after the crash of 1987 because the decline in the market was twice as large as in 1929. B. Economic conditions were more severe after the crash of 1929 even though the decline in the market in 1987 was twice as large as the decline in the market in 1929. C. The market decline in 1929 was twice as large as the market decline in 1987. D. The market decline in 1987 was twice as large as the market decline in 1987.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 17:00
Amarket is said to be equilibrium when quantity demanded is equal to quantity supplied. critically analyse the above statement by giving different types of market
Answers: 2
question
Business, 21.06.2019 23:00
Which of the following statements about the relationship between economic costs and accounting costs is true? multiple choice accounting costs are equal to or greater than economic costs. accounting costs must always equal economic costs. accounting costs are always greater than economic costs. accounting costs are always less than or equal to economic costs.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:00
Acompany that adapts its product mix to meet the needs of a new market is using which of the following global marketing strategies market development diversification strategy product development undiversified
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 14:30
If a product goes up in price, and the demand for it drops, that product's demand is a. elastic b. inelastic c. stable d. fixed select the best answer from the choices provided
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
What reason might Temin give to support his argument that what happened to the economy following the...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 06.07.2019 08:00