Which of these examples does NOT depend on the population size of organisms living in an area (density-independent)? The availability of nuts for squirrels to eat in a forest.
The effect of chemical pollution on insects living in a pond.
The amount of space available for bats to roost in a cave.
The number of mice that are preyed upon by hawks in a field.

option a and d is the correct answer

i hope this u

plz mark as the brainliest answer

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."