subject
World Languages, 07.07.2019 21:00 juansebas35

Can someone me with these two questions and you. (question 1) read the following prompt and type your response in the space provided. you will write two paragraphs about making predictions, an important reading comprehension strategy. explain what predictions are and how you can use them to increase your comprehension. explain how to check or revise predictions while you read. select either " the story of scarface" or "the happy prince" and explain one prediction you made before or while reading the story. be very specific and use examples from the text. in the second paragraph, explain how you confirmed or revised your original prediction as you continued reading the story. explain how this reading comprehension strategy you understand the story. ( question 2) you will write two paragraphs about visualization, an important reading comprehension strategy. in the first paragraph, explain what visualization is and how to do it. then select either " chura and mar

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on World Languages

question
World Languages, 24.06.2019 11:10
Rick read the following argument: although the gas helium is the second most abundant element in the known universe, its supplies on earth are limited. most helium comes either from mining minerals or as a byproduct of natural gas. although helium is in low supply, the demand for it is quite high. it can be used for a variety of medical purposes, including the treatment of breathing problems such as asthma. helium also has heart and nerve protective properties, and doctors are beginning to use it in surgery. yet current laws make recycling helium unprofitable. for the sake of our health, those laws must change. which statement would be the most appropriate in a conclusion to this argument? why? a. “these laws are unlikely to change, so we must take steps to manufacture helium on our own.” this statement makes the logical leap that if we can't recycle helium, we should create it. b. “until human disease is a thing of the past, we cannot support laws that put helium supplies at risk.” this restates the claim of this argument, which is that we should do everything in our power to treat human diseases. c. “if there is any practical use for helium other than medicine, laws should change to protect current supplies of the gas.” this sentence summarizes one of the major points of the argument, which is that helium reserves are in low supply. d. “human health depends on helium, and therefore it is necessary to change the laws that make it hard to acquire.” this restates the claim of the argument and also summarizes the supporting evidence that illnesses can be treated by helium.
Answers: 1
question
World Languages, 25.06.2019 07:50
In approximately 200 words, summarize the main points of jackson kuhl's "innovations that changed building design."
Answers: 2
question
World Languages, 25.06.2019 16:00
Anti-lock braking systems can significantly
Answers: 1
question
World Languages, 27.06.2019 15:00
The root/combining form in the word chondrosarcoma means
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Can someone me with these two questions and you. (question 1) read the following prompt and type...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 07.12.2020 22:30
question
English, 07.12.2020 22:30