PLEASE HELP The 1980s were obviously different times than where we are today. That provokes the questions: Based on the atmosphere of the 1980s and not what we now know, should the US have gotten involved in a coup in another country (in this case, Nicaragua)? Did the US have a valid reason or valid reasons for intervening in the civil unrest of Nicaragua? Why or why not? Regardless of whether you think the US should have gotten involved or not, did the US take the correct measures when it got involved? Why or why not?

The U.S. government works to advance U.S. interests in Nicaragua by helping the country increase its prosperity, security, and democratic governance. Since Nicaragua’s independence, the country has experienced frequent periods of armed conflict, rebellion, and dictatorships, which have interrupted diplomatic relations with the United States a number of times. President Ortega and his wife, Vice President Murillo. Political consolidation permeates all branches of the government, eliminating checks and balances. The president has a super-majority of the National Assembly, which enables him to change any law, including the constitution, at will. He has total control over the Supreme Court, and he frequently uses judicial rulings to provide an artificial cloak of legality to fraudulent, self-serving decisions.

los

explanation:

translation:

are you going to buy new shoes for the interview ? yes i'm buying them