Kent is an accountant who is terribly bored and frustrated with his current position. he feels he is not paid nearly enough and feels terribly unappreciated. ahmed, a very sociable person, is frustrated by the fact that he gets very little human contact throughout the day. the human contact he does have is with his boss, who is frequently absent. james, a construction supervisor, is tired because he is on his feet all day. all other things being equal and based on research, who is most likely to experience burnout?

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

ever since wwii tmthey always did hated each other.