The urn is a "foster child of silence and slow time" in what sense?

The urn is known as the "foster-child" of Silence and slow Time. An ""foster-child" is a child who is embraced and raised by individuals other than his or her own particular guardians.  For this situation, the urn has been embraced by "Silence" and "slow Time," which, in the event that anything, sounds like a considerably more exhausting couple than Mrs. Urn and Mr. Quietness.

The point is that the pot is a great many years old, and it has invested the vast majority of its energy covered in ruble or concealed toward the side of some gallery or some private authority's home. However, these were not its "unique" conditions. The genuine "parent" of the urn would have been the Greek craftsman who made it. Moreover, the pot may have had a stylized utilize as opposed to simply being a lovely thing to take a gander at. In any case, after the decrease of Greek progress, the pot lived on to age peacefully, outside of the energetic culture in which he was made.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

anyone me i need