Larry and carol are tested twice on moral reasoning. the first time, kohlberg's measures are used and carol gets a lower score than larry. the second time, gilligan's approach is used and both individuals score at the same level, that of universal ethical principles (stage 6.) based on research reported in your text, what probably caused this discrepancy?

The answer is that "Kohlberg's approach is a justice perspective while Gilligans is a care perspective".

The larger part of research on the moral advancement of medical attendants is in accordance with Kohlberg's hypothesis. However, Gilligan noticed that care and equity viewpoints coexist in moral clash, and during the development procedure, every supplement each other and advances moral improvement and development.