The approach to psychology views the mind as an active and aware problem-solving system. this view contrasts with the approach to psychology, which focuses on an organism's visible interactions with the environment.

The cognitive approach views the mind as an active and aware problem-solving system. The behavioral approach focuses on an organism’s interactions with the environment.

EXPLANATION

The cognitive approach is different than the behavioral approach. To take it simpler, the cognitive approach focuses on the mind as a problem-solving system, while behavioral psychology focuses on the organism’s visible interactions with the environment.

Cognitive psychology also views the mind as an information processor. In cognitive psychology, there is a cognitive model of information processing inside someone’s head. Cognitive psychology includes perception, attention, language, consciousness, memory, and thinking.

The knowledge from cognitive psychology has been integrated into a lot of other modern disciplines and psychological study. Educational, social psychology, personality psychology, developmental psychology, abnormal psychology, linguistics, and economics, are the broad disciplines that have integrated cognitive psychology.

Meanwhile, behaviorism is a systematic approach in order to understand the behavior of humans and other animals. Behaviorism assumes that all behaviors are reflexes from certain stimuli in the environment. It also can be a consequence of the history of that individual, including punishment and reinforcement.  

Behaviorists still believe that heredity may be a factor in determining someone’s behavior, but they mainly focus on the environmental factor as a determining factor of someone’s behavior. Behaviorism combines a lot of elements, such as philosophy, psychological theory, and methodology. Behaviorism started to emerge in the late nineteenth century.

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

Negative sanction reward for behavior:

Freud’s idea of unconcious mind:

KEYWORD: cognitive, behavioral, psychology

Subject: Social Studies

Class: College

Subchapter: Psychology

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

one way archaeology us understand the past is through the material objects it finds, allowing us to know what was being used, and when. for example a dig recently found a flute, believed to be the oldest musical instrument found to date.

i hope this