What do those who want to see the exclusionary rule abolished argue should be enough to deter police misconduct?

Apparently, the supporters of the exclusionary rule argue that the rule is the one effective deterrent against police misconduct because according to them, the rule must be preserved in order to guarantee that the constitutional rights are must be honored. Moreover, in contrast to those who want to see the exclusionary rule abolished argue that the treat of civil lawsuits should be enough to deter police misconduct because they believed that the rule costs are too much and it operates to precent juries from considering highly relevant evident in which it sometimes operated to allow the guilty to go free. 

it looks like its all of the above. [.wpal1kojopfdpojfrfionrnif.knfdsnksjosjo]

explanation:

you have to combine all of your answers together to

.wpal1kojopfdpojfrfionrnif.knfdsnksjosjo

this is a pretty broad question and can be a pretty lengthy answer. since 1900, women have gained a lot more rights and have become active in the workforce. with women being in the workforce, men play a larger role in family life. many family tasks are shared between men and women, whereas, women used to be the sole family caretakers.

that should get you started at least.