Which of the following was a result of the french and indian war? a. the french were granted all the land west of the appalachian mountains. b. the american colonists signed an agreement not encroach on land west of the appalachian mountains. c. the native americans were guaranteed protection form english colonial encroachment from the french government. d. the american colonists were greatly angered by the way the british army and government had treated them during the war. what turned the tide of the french and indian war in england's favor? a. george washington's victory at fort pitt b. george washington's final stand at fort duquesne c. william pitt's decision to levy heavy taxes against the colonists d. william pitt's decision to make the british military the central fighting force of the war which native american tribe did not align itself with the french during the french and indian war? a. the huron b. the ottawa c. the iroquois d. the algonquin

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?

What does the term mandate” mean in terms of civil rights and liberties?

Choose the correct citation for the case which established the “minimum contacts” test for a court’s jurisdiction in a case. select one: a. brown v. board of education of topeka, 347 u.s. 483 (1954). b. international shoe co. v. washington, 326 u.s. 310 (1945) c. haynes v. gore, 531 u.s. 98 (2000). d. international shoe co. v. washington, 14 u.s. code 336. q