Social Studies, 17.02.2022 06:10 EsiahJohnson

Factors that contribute to destructive relationships

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

Destructive criticism can destroy a relationship.Contempt is toxic to a relationship.A defensive attitude can destroy a relationship.An evasive attitude is just as detrimental.

Explanation:

Criticism hurts and destroys. It’s power is so great that, by itself, it can destroy a relationship. This is especially true when directed at a person (not at their behavior or through a direct discussion), and there is no opportunity for the person to reply.When we show contempt towards our partner, we are poisoning the relationship, causing a deep wound. Contempt attacks the most basic part of a relationship: the respect we should give the other person.With a defensive attitude, we obstruct communication through a barrier that we create by by blaming our partner. We distort their messages and fill them with inferences in order to not show our vulnerability.A violent approach to a discussion conforms to all of the factors we have already mentioned. Criticism and contempt can lead to a defensive attitude; later, when distance begins to be important, the evasive attitude appears.

Hope this helps!

Have a great day! :D

Answer from: Quest

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write

explanation:

Answer from: Quest

answer; eliminate parking problems in cities, because a car took up only half as much space as a horse and buggy;

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 14:00

Whic new weapon increased the importance of footsoldiers during the hundred years’ war?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:30

Jonathan purchases a comic book over the phone. the store does not promise a particular time in which the comic book will be shipped to jonathan. after 40 days, the comic book has not been shipped. do state or federal laws protect jonathan's rights in this case? what is the name of the law? select the best answer from the choices provided. a. federal law; the implied warranty of merchantability b. state law; the implied warranty of merchantability c. federal law; the mail and telephone order rule d. state law; the mail and telephone order rule

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:30

How did the spanish prove to be excellent allies in the war? give examples?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:30

What is the rule relating the ratio of marginal utility to prices of two goods at the optimal choice? explain why, if this rule does not hold, the choice cannot be utility-maximizing.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Factors that contribute to destructive relationships...

Questions