What are different breathing ways of animals?

A.passes laws and adopts budgets b.resolves disputes among members c.ensures legislation is applied fairly d.represents the eu globally a recent challenge to the european union created by a member state is a.migration b.free trade c.brexit d.the euro which is the most powerful position in the british government? a.the monarch b.the chancellor c.the prime minister d.the president which describes a constitutional monarchy? a.a monarchy in which a king or queen has all the power b.a monarchy in which the people elect the king or queen c.a representative government with a mostly ceremonial ruler d.a representative government with only one set of written laws

When recursive formula can be used to determine the total amount of money earned in any year based on the amount earned in the previous years?

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.