A security guard, who was a retired police officer, witnessed a traffic accident. He left his name with one of the parties to the accident. A week later, the attorney for that party contacted him. When the guard met with the attorney about the accident, the guard, as was his habit from his days as a police officer, drew a map of the place where the accident happened that contained various details about the accident. The guard labeled the map with the time and date of the accident and then signed and dated it. The attorney filed a negligence action on behalf of her client against the other party to the accident. Prior to the trial, the security guard died. The attorney, unable to locate the original map drawn by the security guard, seeks to introduce a properly authenticated photocopy of the map into evidence as proof of how the accident occurred. Is this photocopy of the map admissible? a. No, because it is inadmissible hearsay.
b. No, because it violates the original document rule.
c. Yes, as habit evidence.
d. Yes, as past recollection recorded.