at one time, disordered people were simply warehoused in asylums. these were replaced with psychiatric hospitals in which attempts were made to diagnose and cure those with psychological disorders. this best illustrates one of the beneficial consequences of

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

Will give brainliest to the correct answer no randoms the pope cannot forgive any guilt, except by declaring that it has been forgiven by godand by giving in to god's forgiveness. therefore those preachers of in dulgences are in error, who say that by the pope'sindulgences a man is freed from every penalty, and saved. christians are to be taught that he who gives to the poor or lends to the needy does abetter work than buying indulgences. the excerpt above is from martin luther's ninety-five theses. luther posting the ninety-fivetheses is traditionally considered the beginning of the

Atreatment for stuttering in which the person is asked to speak in a singsong fashion, usually with the aid of a metronome is