TGA 5.14 - Texas Revolution Timeline TGA REQ Using your Texas History textbook, put the events in chronological order, starting with the earliest (#1) and ending with the final event (#10).

*these page numbers will help you:

Battle of Gonzalez– page243

Battle of San Jacinto– page 304

Battle of Goliad – page 244

Battle of the Alamo – page278

Battle of Coleto - Page 285

Treaty of Velasco – page 310

Grass Fight - page 249

Runaway scrape – page 298

Siege of Bexar – page 250

Goliad Massacre – Page 287

What british document established the right of free speech that was reinforced by this excerpt

What aspect of the roaring twenties do you think changed society

An employee of the state government always received his state paycheck on the last workday of the month. the employee was not a good money manager, and just barely managed to make it from paycheck to paycheck each month. on the second to the last workday of the month, the employee had $45 in his checking account, and, needing to buy a birthday gift for his sister, he wrote a check to a gift boutique for $100. he knew that he would be receiving his paycheck the next day, so he could deposit the paycheck before the check would be sent to the bank.however, unbeknownst to the employee, the state legislature was having a budget impasse. because the state constitution prohibited any deficit spending, state employees were not paid as usual. without a paycheck to deposit, the check written to the gift boutique was returned for insufficient funds. the merchant complained to the police, who arrested the employee and charged him under a statute that prohibited "issuing a check knowing that it is drawn against insufficient funds, with intent to defraud the payee of the check."what should be the outcome of the employee's prosecution? a not guilty, because the employee intended to deposit his paycheck the next day.b not guilty, because it was reasonable for the employee to expect that he would receive his paycheck as usual.c guilty, because the employee knew when he wrote the check that he did not have sufficient funds in his account to honor it.d guilty, because reliance on a future source of income does not vitiate the employee's violation of the statute when he wrote the check.