PL HELP ME OUT PL GIVING OUT 100 POINTS OUT WHO EVERY ANSWERS THIS CORRECTLY “The purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment was undoubtedly to enforce the absolute equality of the two races before the law,

but in the nature of things, it could not have been the purpose to stop all distinctions based upon color,

or to enforce social or political equality among the two races upon terms that neither race would want”

1. List 2 things the author said that you believe are important.

2. Why do you think the document is written? Why do you think that? (Answer BOTH questions)

3. What is ONE thing this document tell you about life in the United States during Reconstruction.

1. I think it is important when the author tells us that the purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment is to enforce the absolute equality of the two races before the law and that it could not have been its purpose to enforce social or political equality.

2. I think it was written to enforce equality. I think that because it said that in what the author wrote.

3. I thinks it is telling us that they were trying to enforce equality as much as they could.

i wish i knew your answer

Explanation:

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

50% because no one is smart enough to relize that money makes the world go round and 99% of the earth hates donald trump the other 1% is the republicans go figure right