Social Studies, 14.09.2021 14:00 ccelestineiyanoup3y8

The US Supreme Court nas ruled that the separation of powers is integral to the Constitution nor to preserve the prerogatives or each branch or government DUT TO GIVIe governmental powers among the branches so as to keep power diffused-and thereby limited and protective of personal freedom...
Thus, even if one branch of government consented to ceding an essential power to another branch, such a giveaway would be unconstitutional.
Can the president legally use military force to attack a foreign land without a serious threat or legal obligation or a declaration of war from Congress? In a word: No. Here is the back story
IA] bipartisan group of senators offered legislation supported by the president that... would permit a president to strike whomever and wherever he pleases. The president would be restrained
only by a vote of Congress-after hostilities have commenced.
Such a statute would give the president far more powers than he has now, would directly violate Congress' war-making powers by ceding them away to the president would defy the Supreme Court
on the unconstitutionality of giving away core governmental functions, would commit the U. S. to foreign wars without congressional and thus popular support, and would invite dangerous mischief
by any president wanting to attack any enemy-real or imagined, old or new-for foreign or domestic political purposes, whether American interests are at stake or not.
Andrew Napolitano, "At War with the Separation of Powers." The Washington Times, 2018
Which of the following describes a possible method that can check the power of the president who willingly violates the constitutional balance of power as described in the passage?
A
Congress can pass a law that removes the president from office
The Supreme Court can rule that the presidential election results are null and void based on the actions of the president
©
States can recall the president through a special election process.
D
Congress can impeach and remove a president who is unable or unwilling to perform his or her official functions.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:50

Sara and her friends were at an iowa football game in iowa city. sara is a life long resident of iowa and goes to college at dmacc. while she was in iowa city, robert smashed into her car when he ran a red light. sara was seriously injured and taken to university hospitals in iowa city (fortunately her injuries were not life threatening but laid her up for a long time and she had to drop out of college for the rest of the semester). robert is from michigan and was in iowa city to see the game and then to party later. at the time of the accident robert was drunk (at least legally - he blew a 0.17 and the limit is 0.08). sara has sustained about $500,000 in damages between her current and future medical bills, pain/suffering, lost wages, etc. also her car was totaled in the accident. can sara sue robert in a federal court? explain why or why not. (be sure to mention the two primary factors associated with suing someone in a federal court in a case like this.)

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:50

What is gender and race intersection?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30

An employee of the state government always received his state paycheck on the last workday of the month. the employee was not a good money manager, and just barely managed to make it from paycheck to paycheck each month. on the second to the last workday of the month, the employee had $45 in his checking account, and, needing to buy a birthday gift for his sister, he wrote a check to a gift boutique for $100. he knew that he would be receiving his paycheck the next day, so he could deposit the paycheck before the check would be sent to the bank.however, unbeknownst to the employee, the state legislature was having a budget impasse. because the state constitution prohibited any deficit spending, state employees were not paid as usual. without a paycheck to deposit, the check written to the gift boutique was returned for insufficient funds. the merchant complained to the police, who arrested the employee and charged him under a statute that prohibited "issuing a check knowing that it is drawn against insufficient funds, with intent to defraud the payee of the check."what should be the outcome of the employee's prosecution? a not guilty, because the employee intended to deposit his paycheck the next day.b not guilty, because it was reasonable for the employee to expect that he would receive his paycheck as usual.c guilty, because the employee knew when he wrote the check that he did not have sufficient funds in his account to honor it.d guilty, because reliance on a future source of income does not vitiate the employee's violation of the statute when he wrote the check.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30

Drawing on what you have learned in this reading and the previous readings, write a paragraph that describes the role of community colleges in the california education system.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

The US Supreme Court nas ruled that the separation of powers is integral to the Constitution nor to...

Questions