subject
Social Studies, 07.09.2021 21:40 emi73

This question has two parts. First, answer Part A. Then, answer Part B. Part A:
How do Justin and Luis solve the main problem in the text?

A.
They search around in the bushes.

B.
They return the wallet.

C.
They ask Justin’s mother for a ride.

D.
They look for “Johnson” in a directory.

Part B:
Which sentence from the text best supports your answer to Part A?

A.
“I went over to the spot, brushed away a few leaves, picked it up, and we saw that the wallet had sparkling imitation jewels.”

B.
“We should look for other clues first, in order to narrow down the possibilities.”

C.
“Justin said, ‘My mom probably will drive us.’”

D.
“She smiled at us and said, ‘What a relief!’”

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:00
What is one main reason some governments in the twentieth century began campaigns of genocide? a) a minority group wanted total independence. b) a minority group wanted more say in lawmaking. c) a minority group had different cultural customs. d)a minority group protested against government policy.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:30
How did the mali empire come to an end? a. rulers lost control of gao. b. they were conquered by axum. c. ghana took over their territory. d. sundiata was captured by mansa musa brainliest!
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:40
Explain why the judicial branch is considered the weakest branch. explain what might happen if the judicial branch could not separate itself from the other two branches. explain how a strong judiciary branch would maintain limited government and individual rights. explain why a law that contradicts the constitution must be ruled invalid. explain why the legislature may not determine if its laws are unconstitutional. hamilton argues that the judicial branch is not above the legislative branch. explain his reasoning. how is the problem solved when two laws passed by the same legislature contradict each other? explain why hamilton believes it is pointless to argue the power of judicial review will enable judges to rule in ways that serve their own interests. explain how life tenure is necessary for the judicial branch to be able to protect individual rights against a majority. explain how everyone benefits when the rights of individuals or groups are protected. explain how limited terms of office might discourage the best-qualified people.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00
What happens after a star goes supernova? just wondering! [tex]supernova [/tex] answer asap i really wanna know!
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
This question has two parts. First, answer Part A. Then, answer Part B. Part A:
How do Justi...
Questions