Page 1:Page 2: And though my head felt heavy,
I played on till dusk
Missing flies and pop-ups and grounders
And calling out in desperation things like
“Yours” and “take it,” but doing all right,
Tugging at my cap in just the right way,
Crouching low, my feet set.
“Hum baby” sweetly on my lips.

—“How I Learned English,”
Gregory Djanikan

Compare the original ending with the version in which most of the vivid language has been taken out. Write three to four sentences explaining how the original version helps you visualize and understand the poem’s story.

This question seems to be incomplete. However, there is enough information to find the right answer.

Even without reading the version in which most of the vivid language has been taken out, we can imagine that it wouldn´t be as effective as the original, because the vivid description is a key element for visualizing and understanding the story.

Explanation:

In this excerpt from the poem, the one that closes the story, we can see that the narrator is now happy, feeling he has been accepted and becomes able to enjoy the baseball game.

first of all, it's important to say that the book we shall not be moved, written by joan dash, is about the first strike of women in the united states in the year 1909. the best historical detail to clarify the reader's undertanding is the phrase "general strike". this strike involved women working at a garment factory who decided to protest   long working hours, low wages and brutal conditions. this strike became known as "the new york shirtwaist strike" or "the uprising of the 20,000". the strike mostly involved jewish women who did not speak english or who had a basic knowledge of the english language. finally, the strike went on from november 1909 until february 1910.

what is the answer