subject
Social Studies, 19.07.2021 18:40 babydoll818

a) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Shaw v. Reno and Easley v. Cromartie. b) Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts elucidated in Easley v. Cromartie might have led to a different holding than the holding in Shaw v. Reno. c) Describe an action that members of the public who disagree with the holding in Easley v. Cromartie could take to limit its impact.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 19:30
How do quotas domestic producers? quotas facilitate increased exports of domestic goods. quotas lower the cost of domestic goods. quotas limit the number of producers that compete in a sector. quotas facilitate the sale of more domestic goods.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:10
In griswold v. connecticut, on what did justice goldberg base his concurring opinion? the protection granted by the constitution the intention of the writers of the constitution the list of rights in the first eight amendments the human rights safe from government intervention
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:30
Give an example of a situation in which an individual's pursuit of economic self-interest may not benefit but instead harm the rest of society
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:00
What do you call places that belong to united states but arent states
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
a) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Shaw v. Reno and Easley v. Cromartie. b...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 11.02.2021 17:40
question
Mathematics, 11.02.2021 17:40
question
Mathematics, 11.02.2021 17:40