Figgins is the dean of a college. He appointed Sue to be acting dean while he was out of the country and posted an announcement on the college website which said that Sue was authorized to act in his place. Figgins also told Sue privately that she could do most everything in his job description while he was away, but she did not have the right to make admissions decisions. While Figgins was gone, Sue overruled the admissions committee to admit the child of a wealthy alumnus. Does the child have the right to attend this college

Yes

Explanation:

Yes, in this scenario the child has the right to attend this college. This is because despite Fliggins telling Sue privately that she could not make admission decisions, he still publicly appointed her acting dean and publicly gave her all authority as a dean. Therefore, due to this Sue had apparent authority over all matters that are normally handled by the dean of the college. This includes admissions to the college.

well this isn't a question but if you are asking if it is true or false it is, true.

answer; (who);