"Logic puzzles help prevent Alzheimer's disease because they help keep the brain active." The sentence above is an enthymeme. Add the missing premise that turns it into a valid deductive argument. (1) Rewrite the full argument in Standard Form by including the missing premise and/or conclusion, then (2) demonstrate that the argument is valid by using the Venn diagram method, and (3) based on your diagram, evaluate the argument by correctly using the terminology of deductive logic.

Here is what I have:

P1: Logic puzzles help keep the brain active
P2: [An active brain lowers the chances of developing Alzheimer's disease]
C:Logic puzzles help prevent Alzheimer's disease

Can someone help me create a venn diagram of this?

How does the establishment clause limit government?

It is widely assumed that people need to engage in intellectual activities such as solving crossword puzzles or mathematics problems in order to maintain mental sharpness as they age. in fact, however, simply talking to other people—that is, participating in social interaction, which engages many mental and perceptual skills—suffices. evidence to this effect comes from a study showing that the more social contact people report, the better their mental skills. which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the force of the evidence cited? (a) as people grow older, they are often advised to keep exercising their physical and mental capacities in order to maintain or improve them. (b) many medical conditions and treatments that adversely affect a person's mental sharpness also tend to increase that person's social isolation. (c) many people are proficient both in social interactions and in solving mathematical problems. (d) the study did not itself collect data but analyzed data bearing on the issue from prior studies. (e) the tasks evaluating mental sharpness for which data were compiled by the study were more akin to mathematics problems than to conversation.

How long was the government shutdown?