subject
Social Studies, 09.07.2021 19:50 ammyraammirez24

Spell out a reductio ad absurdum argument to refute each of the following claims. If no such reductio is possible, explain why. A reductio ad absurdum is deep only if it reveals that a claim implies an ab- surd result that cannot be avoided without modifying the claim in essential respects or giving it up entirely. In sum, then, a reductio ad absurdum argument tries to show that one claim, X, is false because it implies another claim, Y, that is absurd. To evalu- ate such an argument, the following questions should be asked: 1. Is Y really absurd?
2. Does X really imply Y?
3. Can X be modified in some minor way so that it no longer implies Y?

If either of the first two questions is answered in the negative, then the reductio fails; if the third question receives an affirmative answer, then the reductio is shallow. Otherwise, the reductio ad absurdum argument is both successful and deep.

1. Some sisters are nephews.
2. Most students scored better than the median grade on the last test.
3. There is an exception to every universal claim.
4. Some morally wrong actions are morally permitted.
5. There is a male barber in this town who shaves all and only the men in this town who do not shave themselves.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:40
Which of the four varnas are soldiers placed in? a. sudra b. brahmin c. vaishya d. kshatriya
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:30
What consequences could gen galvez have faced for his major act of bravery?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:40
Tanya was used to using word, and she did some work for her brother mike, who was using wordperfect. tanya was quickly able to use wordperfect for windows with little difficulty, since many of the commands for it were the same as the commands for word. tanya's ability to use wordperfect best illustrates:
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:00
Which of the following selections is least useful for supporting the claim that states intentionally built unequal school systems? question 1 options: the supreme court ruling in plessy v. ferguson (1896) wrote into law that america had two separate societies: one black and one white. it was very clear by the mid-1900s that southern states had expertly built separate educational systems. these schools, however, were never equal. states with laws keeping schools segregated never gave equal amounts of money to their black and white schools. ten years after brown, fewer than 10 percent of southern public schools had integrated. some areas did not comply at all.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Spell out a reductio ad absurdum argument to refute each of the following claims. If no such reducti...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 19.06.2020 11:57
question
Mathematics, 19.06.2020 11:57
question
Mathematics, 19.06.2020 11:57
question
Biology, 19.06.2020 11:57
question
Mathematics, 19.06.2020 11:57
question
Mathematics, 19.06.2020 11:57