subject
Social Studies, 23.06.2021 21:10 imello51

In a property settlement after a divorce, the wife was awarded all personal property that had been accumulated during the marriage, including the husband's classic 19-inch black-and-white TV set. In order to get his prized TV set back, the husband lied to his friend, telling him that the wife took the TV set in violation of the property settlement. The friend remembered that the wife gave the friend's wife a key to her new home, and he volunteered to go with the husband to get the TV back while the wife was at work. The husband and the friend went to the wife's house, but, unbeknownst to them, the wife had taken the day off work. After the friend noisily opened the back door with his wife's key, the wife called the police, who quickly arrived and arrested the husband and the friend. As to a charge of common law conspiracy to commit larceny, how should the friend be found?

A Not guilty, because he did not intend to steal.

B Not guilty, because he did not have a corrupt motive.

C Guilty, because there was an agreement, and the opening of the locked door was sufficient for the overt act.

D Guilty, because good motives are not a defense to criminal liability.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:20
Read the scenario. samira is a freshman basketball player who hopes to go to college on a basketball scholarship. she is offered the chance to play on her school’s varsity basketball team, which plays in tournaments during holiday breaks. samira usually spends her breaks working at the local hardware store. after careful consideration, samira decides to stay on the freshman basketball team and keep working over breaks.the fact that samira may miss out on a scholarship opportunity by staying on the freshman team illustrates-a cause.-minor consequences.-a trade off.-unexpected risk.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:20
Which of the following statements about imprisonment rates in the united states is true? the united states imprisons people at a higher rate than russia, mexico, or canada. the united states imprisons people at a lower rate than russia or south africa, but higher than israel. the united states imprisons people at a lower rate than russia, mexico, or canada. russia, south africa, and mexico each imprison more people than the united states.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:00
Acharacterized by intimate, long-term, face-to-face association and cooperation. primary group community clique secondary group
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:00
On average, being married has a(n) effect on happiness.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In a property settlement after a divorce, the wife was awarded all personal property that had been a...
Questions
question
Health, 16.06.2020 04:57
question
History, 16.06.2020 04:57
question
English, 16.06.2020 04:57
question
Mathematics, 16.06.2020 04:57