PLEASE HURRY Which of these best explains why the St. Lawrence Seaway was a project that
the United States and Canada
completed together?
F The project cost more than one
country could afford.
G The project required more workers
than one country could provide.
H The location of the project benefited
both countries.
J The currency used in both countries
is the same.

H

Explanation:

because it was channeled in Canada and the United States

i feel as if they would both catch on before to long because they would see them to frequent

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.