I WILL GIVE OUT BRAINLIEST AND 100 POINTS Lesson 5.09 Download a copy
At the top left, click File and Download
Choose your file type. This will download to your computer so you can have your own copy to type on and save.

Instructions-Your Opinion Matters
You have finished reading a novel or short story. It is time to share your thoughts. One common way to do so is by writing a book review.
A book review describes, analyzes, and evaluates what you have read. It expresses your opinions with support from the text so others can make an informed choice about whether they should read the book themselves.
Step 1: Writing Your Introduction/Description
There are several key steps to writing an effective book review. The first is creating a strong introduction and description. The opening paragraph will capture readers’ attention and provide clear facts about the text you are reviewing.
The introduction/description should include:
a hook to inspire readers to look at or listen to your review. Hook readers with an unusual question, a vivid description, or a fascinating statement taken from the book or author.
specific information including the title, author, and genre of the story.
a brief summary of the setting, characters, and plot. Provide enough details to get readers interested without giving away important facts that will spoil the story.

Example Intro: What would you do if you suspected someone in your school was an alien? The play Alienated, by Ken Preuss is a comedy and mystery set in a modern-day high school in Mapleville. Convinced one of her classmates is an alien, Cammie questions students about a strange light that appears every six years.

Write your Intro Here:

Okay do you need help with it or you just want the answer ?

As citizens grow increasingly wary of whose interests are being represented in the public policy arena, especially in light of recent sensational scandals showing a cozy relationship between professional lobbyists and lawmakers, a crisis of confidence is engulfing many democratic societies across the european and north american continents. public perceptions of undue influence peddling, in which special interest groups exercise too much sway over government for self-serving purposes, have led to growing demands for the regulation of lobbyists and transparency of the policymaking process. the united states and canada have been struggling for decades to refine their systems of lobbyist regulation. of all the shortcomings of the north american model of lobbyist regulation – and there are many – transparency is not, for the most part, one of them. many european countries have also been experimenting with systems of lobbyist regulation. until recently, however, the european national experiments have produced very different results among themselves and in comparison with the north american counterparts. surprisingly, some of the earliest efforts to regulate lobbying occurred among new democratic countries in eastern europe rather than the more advanced industrial democracies of western europe. this observation stands in stark contrast to the north american experience, where lobbyist regulation emerged as an effort to manage a highly developed class of professional lobbyists within the strictures of long-standing democratic principles. the authors find that the answer to this anomaly lies in the fact that early european lobbyist regulations focused not on  transparency  as a means to regain public confidence in government, but on providing business interests with  access  to lawmakers as a means to bolster fledgling economies. this focus on access is quickly giving way to demands for transparency as many european governments, racked by scandal, are striving to salvage the public's trust. propelled largely by example from a reluctant european parliament and commission, which are themselves attempting to convince europe that a regional government is in its own interest, several european countries are beginning to make a transition from weak systems of lobbyist regulation, which emphasize business access, to strong systems of lobbyist regulation, which emphasize public transparency. in order to discern ‘best’ practices for achieving transparency through lobbying regulation, the authors first chart the regulatory systems of the united states and canada. that is followed by an analysis of all of the european lobbying regimes. the oft-expressed objection to this new trend toward transparency in europe – that professional lobbyists view such regulations as overly burdensome – is undercut by research on european and american lobbyists’ attitudes toward regulation, which are generally quite favorable. like everyone else, lobbyists realize that they have an image problem and that the best way to address that problem is by operating in the broad daylight of public transparency. finally, the authors offer recommendations on how to enhance transparency in policymaking, drawing from detailed comparisons of the north american and european models of lobbyist regulation.