subject

PLZ HELP! URGENT! Nations around the world put pressure on South Africa to end apartheid. What type of pressure was most effective?
A.
encouraging civil war
B.
rejecting South African immigrants
C.
promising financial aid to black communities throughout South Africa
D.
banning South African participation in international sports competitions

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:00
Which choice best describes the general trend for the countries shown, for the period 2008 - 2010?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 23:00
The were so closely connected to the tang dynasty that korean elites used chinese as their written language. they set up a statewide academy that trained government officials in the philosophy of .
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:40
The form the boundary between north and south china. a. himalayan mountains c. change river b. xi river d. qinling shandi mountains
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
PLZ HELP! URGENT! Nations around the world put pressure on South Africa to end apartheid. What type...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 18.12.2020 14:00
question
English, 18.12.2020 14:00
question
Mathematics, 18.12.2020 14:00
question
Biology, 18.12.2020 14:00