You have read two opposing points of view in "The Dangers of Social Media." In your opinion, which author made the stronger argument? Why was the author you chose more convincing? Use evidence to support your answer.

Hello. You have not submitted the text to which this question refers. This makes it impossible for your question to be answered. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.

It is only possible to answer this question by reading the two texts. Also, this is a personal question so first of all, you should reflect on what you think about the dangers that social media can offer to users. Do you think social media can influence you incorrectly? do you think social media can impose negative standards on society? Do you think that social media can promote exaggerated exposure? These are some concepts that you can reflect on to create your opinion about the dangers that social media can cause.

Then, you should read both texts and pay attention to how the authors approach these dangers and which author managed to present an argument that most closely resembles the opinion you have on this subject.

Therefore, you must answer this question by showing how you and this author present similar arguments and opinions.

d - failures.

the only attempted british colony in north america before 1600 was roanoke, virginia, which was a total failure. england claimed several areas, including newfoundland, but made no sustainable attempts to colonize them before 1600.