HELP!! Which amendment/right best applies to the following scenario?

Kathryn, an eighteen year old college student, is arrested for stealing a classmate’s designer sweater and selling it on eBay. When Kathryn appears before the judge, she asks for a lawyer to help defend her. The judge tells Kathryn she cannot have a lawyer because if she is smart enough to be in college, she knows enough to defend herself.

A) Fourth amendment-no illegal searches or seizures
B) Fifth amendment-cannot be forced to testify against yourself
C) Sixth amendment-the right to an attorney
D) Eighth amendment-the punishment must fit the crime

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.