To curb this threat, often referred to as majority tyranny, one of the goals of the founders was to

Sara and her friends were at an iowa football game in iowa city. sara is a life long resident of iowa and goes to college at dmacc. while she was in iowa city, robert smashed into her car when he ran a red light. sara was seriously injured and taken to university hospitals in iowa city (fortunately her injuries were not life threatening but laid her up for a long time and she had to drop out of college for the rest of the semester). robert is from michigan and was in iowa city to see the game and then to party later. at the time of the accident robert was drunk (at least legally - he blew a 0.17 and the limit is 0.08). sara has sustained about $500,000 in damages between her current and future medical bills, pain/suffering, lost wages, etc. also her car was totaled in the accident. can sara sue robert in a federal court? explain why or why not. (be sure to mention the two primary factors associated with suing someone in a federal court in a case like this.)

Adescription of at least one real life problem that has to be solved or decision that has to be made using good judgment, and obstacles encountered while making the decision(s) or solving the problem(s) (again, these can be real examples or imagined, but they should clearly illustrate your understanding of the obstacles described.) at least three key terms from the lesson used in your example(s):

How was south asia worked to meet the needs of its largest populationchoose all that are correct a) by implementing the green revolution b) by putting the dalits to work c) by developing cottage industries d) by doing outsourcing for other countries