If a person views a situation as having low consensus, low distinctiveness, and high consistency, he or she is likely to make an attribution of:

The person is probably going to make an attribution of interior causes. In Internal attribution, factors like qualities, capacities, frames of mind, or sentiments are the segment of one's close to home conduct and how the individual contemplates the circumstance.  

Further Explanation:  

Interior attribution:  

Hypothesis of good speculation dependent on the idea of miens is proposed here. ... At long last, it is contended that an In Internal attribution on great reasoning is a generative method for moving toward issues concerning hypotheses of reasoning, the all inclusive statement of reasoning capacities, theoretical improvement, culture, and training.  

interior attribution mean:  

An inside attribution (otherwise called a dispositional attribution) is the point at which an individual uses an individual reason as the reason for a circumstance or occasion rather than an outer (or natural) attribution. For instance, an individual gets a terrible evaluation on a test. They question themselves regarding why they got such a terrible evaluation.  

accord in attribution hypothesis:

Kelley's covariation model (1967, 1971, 1972, 1973) is an attribution hypothesis wherein individuals make causal surmisings to clarify why other individuals and ourselves carry on with a particular goal in mind. Attributions are made dependent on three criteria: Consensus, Distinctiveness, and Consistency (Kelley, 1973).

Subject: social studies

Level: college

Keywords: Interior attribution, interior attribution mean, accord in attribution hypothesis.

Related links:  

Learn more about evolution on

Internal Causes

Further Explanation:

Covariation model of Harold Kelley’s is an attribution theory that explains the causes of the difference in human behavior. It explains why people and ourselves behave differently. It deals with social and self-perception. The behavior is attributed to the courses that crop up over time. The causes of the outcome can have internal and external circumstances or a combination of both factors. Attributions have three criteria consensus,consistency and distinctiveness. The consensus is a co-variation in the behavior of different people. If many people find Lisa attractive, then the consensus is high. If only Arnold finds her attractive then consensus is low. In the above example, the high consensus is related to stimulus i.e. Lisa and the low consensus is related to people i.e. Arnold. Distinctiveness is related to how unique is the behavior in a particular situation. The distinctiveness is low when a person behaves similarly in all situations. Consistency is the covariation of the behavior across time. If Jane is generous every time she shows a high consistency.

Learn More:

1.Under new imperialism, Europe did not need large numbers of people to control territories because of

2.Evaluate and discuss the negative impact of youth risk behavior on yourself and others

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Covariation Model

Subject: Social Science

Keywords:

Covariation, Harold Kelley’s, attribution theory, behave differently, social and self-perception, consensus, consistency, distinctiveness.

answer; i believe the correct answer is (a) the correlation between the cause variable and outcome variable is zero;