Answers: 3
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:00
For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:30
What consequences could gen galvez have faced for his major act of bravery?
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30
What was the result of president taft's "dollar diplomacy
Answers: 2
Did jackson or adams increase tarrifs?...
Mathematics, 23.04.2021 20:50
English, 23.04.2021 20:50
Mathematics, 23.04.2021 20:50
History, 23.04.2021 20:50
Mathematics, 23.04.2021 20:50
Chemistry, 23.04.2021 20:50
Mathematics, 23.04.2021 20:50
Mathematics, 23.04.2021 20:50
Mathematics, 23.04.2021 20:50
Business, 23.04.2021 20:50
Mathematics, 23.04.2021 20:50
Advanced Placement (AP), 23.04.2021 20:50