Ted works around electrical equipment everyday. which of the following is a safe work practice to protect him from electrocution hazards?

a.
attach ungrounded, two-prong adapter plugs to three-prong cords and tools
b.
do not operate electrical equipment when working in wet conditions
c.
hold fingers on the switch while carrying a plugged-in tool
d.
none of the answers are correct
e.
use gfci only when using double insulated power tools

The correct answer is B. Do not operate electrical equipment when working in wet conditions.

Explanation:

Electrocution hazards are conditions or situations including workplace that expose a person to possible electrocution, which is a high amount of electrical energy that can lethal or have considerable negative effects on one's health including burns and shocks. Considering using electrical equipment everyday represents multiple electrocution hazards it is important to follow certain steps to avoid a possible electrocution this includes using  a GFCI which is a device that can protect you in case of electric shocks all the time or as much as possible; avoid overloading outlets ; make sure the electrical equipment works properly; follow the right steps when doing procedures that involve electricity or electrical equipment and avoid working in wet conditions as water works as a conductor for electricity which means if there is electricity near to a wet zone being in contact with that zone will cause the worker to electrocute. Thus, from the options given the one that is a safe work practice to avoid electrocution hazards is B. do not operate electrical equipment when working in wet conditions.

answer; (true);

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.