Imagine the u. s. congress is considering legislation that will ban mtbe, a substance added to gasoline to reduce emissions. this legislation was proposed due to complaints from citizens and interest groups who believe mtbe is a health threat. in a well-written paragraph, analyze whether the benefits of creating this ban are worth the costs. use examples from the module to support your answer.

Banning MTBE would be beneficial because it would reduce the emissions released from gasoline engines. When breathing in these emissions, can cause impaired lung function and also lung cancer. As well as health issues, these emissions could cause a fire because it's a flammable material. I do think that this ban is worth the cost because allowing for this ban on the MTBE would reduce health and lung issues in individuals who live in urban areas and are constantly surrounded by this substance added to gasoline.  

Explanation:

uhh idk for sure but i think it makes it difficult to pump the oil through the oil rigs