If the road surface or visibility is compromised in any way, such as by traffic congestion or bad weather, you must

drive at the posted speed limit
adjust your speed
use cruise control
drive with your hazard lights on

The correct option is (b) adjust your speed.

Further explanation:

On the road when road surface or visibility is compromised in any way, such as by traffic congestion or bad weather, you must adjust your speed.  Bad weather decreases the vision of the driver and makes roads slippery which increases the chances of an accident so it is suggested that one should adjust his speed in bad weather. In traffic congestion also, one should drive slowly and with safety.

WHY SHOULD ONE ADJUST HIS SPEED IN TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND BAD WEATHER?

The main reason for traffic congestion is too many vehicles. With the increase in population, the numerous vehicles on the road is also increasing which leads to traffic on the road and has become a major problem nowadays.

Inadequate infrastructure is also the main reason behind traffic congestion. The quality of public transports is not good which leads to people travel by their own vehicle. To deal with these facilities the government should take initiatives to make public transport better.

Learn more:

1. When you notice a safety hazard, what should your first step be?

2. Contributory factors to most accidents in the world.

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Subject: Social Studies

Topic: Road Safety

Keywords: speed, traffic, congestion, population, infrastructure, government, transport, weather

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

ne pare rău, dar când mi-am căutat întrebarea, doar avioanele au apărut .. deci, ar putea fi răspunsul, sau ar putea fi baloane cu aer cald, deoarece acestea pot conta și ca ambarcațiunile de aer, dar nu sunt complet sigur de asta. a fost doar o presupunere, sper că am ajutat, îmi pare rău dacă nu am făcut-o. de asemenea, folosesc traducerea google, pentru a traduce ceea ce spun în engleză, așa că îmi pare rău dacă gramatica sau chiar limba nu este corectă