What is the difference between the terms “not guilty” and “innocent? ”

a. it cannot be proved that an individual is “innocent.” juries say “not guilty” because guilt was not proved in the case.

b. the terms have no significant difference in meaning. juries and judges use them the same way in a court of law.

c. “not guilty” is a verdict used in criminal cases only. however, an “innocent” verdict can only be used in civil cases.

d. a jury will say “innocent” instead of “not guilty” if the person seems to have had no part in the case before the court.

answer; first blank(1); 30% two(2); salmonella; i believe this is correct; //good luck;

is there multiple choice or do you need like an essay answer?

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.