Why do many Latin American countries blame the United States for problems in their
countries? Please answer in a complete sentence you may use this URL. https://www. clairmontpress. com/WS17/ws17_6-msh_full/pdfs/WS17- 6_Ch12.pdf

Because it's easy. For example, it is easy to blame minorities that they are stealing jobs from the majority. The problem with that is that if a person does not have many social contacts nor that much of an education and can still get the job and do it correctly, then the problem is not that the minority got the job that they obviously deserve, but that the majority just wants an excuse for personal failures.

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals