subject
Social Studies, 11.04.2021 21:40 rhettperkins

“Americans often preferred not to think about the terrible war in Europe [the First World War]. By 1917, however, US citizens realized that ignoring the war or pretending it had nothing to do with them imperiled their future. “. . . They realized that they had run out of options. Between 1914 and 1917, Americans had variously hoped that their nation could serve as an arbiter (as it had during the Russo-Japanese War, earning Theodore Roosevelt the country’s first Nobel Peace Prize), the leader of a global peace movement, the center of international arbitration, and the advocate of worldwide disarmament. By early 1917, however, the majority had come to two conclusions. First, as Charles Fremont Taylor, the editor of a Philadelphia-based magazine, articulated, ‘no nation can be a hermit in these days of steamships, railroads, telegraphs, ocean cables, wireless, etc.’ They no longer believed, as they had in 1914, that the Atlantic Ocean provided the country with sufficient protection from Europe’s wars. Second, they believed that their leaders had tried every option short of war only to find the country in an even more perilous geopolitical position.”

Michael S. Neiberg, historian, The Path to War: How the First World War Created Modern America, 2016

Using the excerpt, answer (a), (b), and (c).

Briefly describe ONE piece of evidence used in the excerpt to support the argument made in the excerpt.

Briefly explain how ONE piece of evidence not mentioned in the excerpt could be used to support, modify, or refute the argument in the excerpt.

Briefly explain how ONE process discussed in the excerpt compares with the earlier United States decision to participate in the Spanish-American War.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30
What is the contribution of women in making the family and in the nation?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30
The authors of the paper "fudging the numbers: distributing chocolate influences student evaluations of an undergraduate course"† carried out a study to see if events unrelated to an undergraduate course could affect student evaluations. students enrolled in statistics courses taught by the same instructor participated in the study. all students attended the same lectures and one of six discussion sections that met once a week. at the end of the course, the researchers chose three of the discussion sections to be the "chocolate group." students in these three sections were offered chocolate prior to having them fill out course evaluations. students in the other three sections were not offered chocolate. the researchers concluded that "overall, students offered chocolate gave more positive evaluations than students not offered chocolate." indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. give a brief explanation for your choice.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 10:30
In the three centuries from ad1100 to ad1400 many changes took place in western
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 11:00
How do language and rhythm work together in poetry? explain the relationship between language and rhythm as it relates to poetry.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
“Americans often preferred not to think about the terrible war in Europe [the First World War]. By 1...
Questions
question
Biology, 22.08.2019 18:30
question
History, 22.08.2019 18:30