Explain and distinguish the following concepts: metaethical relativism, metaethical objectivism, situation relativism, and situation absolutism. In explaining these, assume that your reader is a friend also attending college but who isn't taking a philosophy course. She asks you what you're studying and you try to tell her by explaining these concepts.

Metaethical relativism is a concept that explains that moral judgments are relative to a particular condition or standpoint and can not be true or false in a complete sense. So scientists believe in some sort of beliefs, influence, customs and that makes the judgment that is relative to a particular standpoint.

Metaethical objectivism is free from a particular standpoint and completely based on one moral ground or principle. Here mathematical relativism focuses on ethical judgment.

Situation relativism is a concept or approach that based on relative situations and mindset rather than legalistic approaches. Therefore, there is no word like perfect or never in this approach.

Situation absolutism is totally based on ethics and principle irrespective of situation or condition and focus only on what is right or wrong.