Was the united states justified in the actions described? why or why not. must answer in at least 4 sentences using facts to back your reasoning.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you forgot to include the text, case, example, excerpt, or further reference to answer your question.

We do not know what you are talking about because y forgot to attach the proper information. Your question only says: "Was the United States justified in the actions described?"

What are the actions? There is no text that describes any actions.

However, trying to help you with something, we can comment on the following.

There are many questions like this that refer to the actions taken by the United States regarding expansionist and imperialistic ideas. If that is the case, then we can say the following.

Under the principle of the Manifested Destiny, the United States had taken interventionist or expansionist actions that have resulted in the increase of the size of its territory, by annexing big portions of land.

That was teh case of the Mexican-American War, in which after the US victory, it annexed California, Arizona, and New Mexico.

Another good example was teh Spanish-American War of 1898. After the war, the US victory gave the US control of territories that belonged to the Spanish crown. We are talking about Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines.

For these kinds of actions, and new interventionist ones in the Middle East of Central American, the US has been severely criticized worldwide.

50% because no one is smart enough to relize that money makes the world go round and 99% of the earth hates donald trump the other 1% is the republicans go figure right

all freedom fighters demanded for constitution. so british finally granted india it's freedom. then a constituent assembly was formed. it's chair man was rajendra prasad and its deputy chairman was dr. br ambedkar.

this assembly take the time of about one year than our constitution was finally formed.

explanation: