Um Hiii everyone! Can someone PLEASE HELP ME :( I just can't find the answers :( and I don't get the answers :( These are the questions and if you can't find them it's ok :)

1. Why are the largest cities n Southwest Asia located near major rivers?
2. Where do the Bedouins in Southwest Asia normally live?

3. People living in the deseerts in Southwest Asia usually made there living by?

4. What descibes the usual climate of Southwest Asia?

5. Why does the rivers in Southwest Asia have political isues?

6. Which do Turkey, Syria and Kuwait share?

7. Why is irrigation important to the people who live in Southwest Asia?

8. Why does the organization of OPEC play a powerful role in the world economhy today?

9. Which countries are the most oil-rich in the Southwestern Asian region?

10. What are the two most valuable natural resources in Southwest Asia?

Based on your approved case, create fictitious digital evidence. you may use logs from your own computer (no personal information) as a guide or search the internet for samples. these samples do not have to be technically correct, but there must be a reasonable presumption that this information would exist, supported by a reference. document who, when, and how the evidence was obtained. remember, you are creating fictitious examples, so refer to prior reading or examples of how digital evidence was collected. if necessary, refer to the "who" as a "systems administrator" and ensure the fictitious person is identified and referenced in your investigation. digital evidence must meet each of the following criteria: some of your digital evidence must be retrieved by computer forensics. some of your digital evidence must be retrieved from log files. digital evidence must contain information to support who, what, when, where, and how the cyber-crime was committed. present digital copies of your evidence in text files, screen shots, or pdfs.

How much time on average do americans currently spend watching tv and videos per day?

Arthur met rottweiler breeders lynda and george at a dog show in rhode island. the couple, who reside in new york state, later sold several rottweiler dogs to arthur who lived in rhode island. arthur later sued lynda and george, claiming that the dogs were sick and infirm. he filed a complaint in rhode island courts, claiming that even though the dogs were sold in new york, the breeders had attended the dog show and advertised in the rottweiler newsletter which was distributed at the event in rhode island. based on the facts, do you think rhode island courts have personal jurisdiction in this case?