subject
Social Studies, 01.03.2021 06:10 payshencec21

PPPZZZ HHHEEELLL This was due yesterday. I actually rlly need help with this :( Comparison: Choose two groups of people that were described in the article. How was their experience of the event similar? How was it different? Write a response that compares the perspectives of two groups of people using details from the article.

Here is the link to the article

https://newsela. com/read/lib-ushistory-puritans-col onial-new-england/id/29388/

just sign in with an account to get access to the article :D

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 19:00
Water and soil are brought into the indus river valley as a result of a. high winds b. annual floods c. long droughts d. seasonal tornadoes
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
What is the role of buyer & seller in the marketplace
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 04:00
What is one way the congress used normal legislation to affect the executive branch of government? a) congress passed laws to regulate commerce. b) congress established federal courts below the supreme court. c) congress set up agencies, departments, and offices. d) congress creates the presidency and vice presidency.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
PPPZZZ HHHEEELLL This was due yesterday. I actually rlly need help with this :( Comparison: Choose...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 03.07.2019 22:30