A free enterprise system provides individuals the opportunity to make their own economic decisions, without restrictions from the government. It allows the supply and demand of consumers to determine the success or failure of an economic endeavor. As a result, some business owners have become successful, while others have not. In an essay, you will choose an entrepreneur and argue whether the free enterprise system was necessary for that individual to make an impact on the business world.

In light of the given discussion, the United States of America is a free enterprise economy with experiential entrepreneurship one among them is Mitt Romney the top businessman in the US.

Explanation:

This system helps an economy to flourish

Taxation revenue is largely contributed by budding entrepreneurs

The decision making in free enterprises is fast-paced in all aspects

Free enterprises promote major transformations in an economy in terms of public policymaking

Entrepreneur participate in government initiatives to create social infrastructure  

Rapid industrialisation is a central theme of free enterprise

Free enterprises help flourish an economy:

The free enterprise system is a type of economy used in capitalism where the market determines the price of the products and services and not the government, so each individual should be able to make their own economic decision without any problem or restriction. It's an economy where business are free from government control and the only thing that would determine their success or failure would be the supply and demand of the consumers.

So you would have to choose and make some research about an entrepreneur and explain if you think that this system helped that person to make an impact on the business world and what's your posture about it: do you think it works? do you think it's good? Bad? Does it help? Is it fair? Why?; all that using arguments according to what the free enterprise system is.

I hope this helps :)

well considering i can't see the graph, it's probably prices

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals