subject
Social Studies, 19.02.2021 21:50 neko64

Which sentence best compares these two points of view? Cobb thinks they should support the Union; Stephens thinks they should oppose it.
Cobb believes they should secede right away; Stephens believes they should wait.
Stephens thinks they should vote to secede; Cobb thinks they should be cautious.
Stephens wants to show Lincoln respect; Cobb wants to vote him out of office.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00
What words in the preamble to the constitution reflect the principle of popular sovereignty
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00
“dear sir: it is with great reluctance, i trouble you on a subject, which does not fall within your province; but it is a subject that occasions me more distress, than i have felt, since the commencement of the war; and which loudly demands the most zealous exertions of every person of weight and authority, who is interested in the success of our affairs. i mean the present dreadful situation of the army for want of provisions, and the miserable prospects before us, with respect to futurity. it is more alarming than you will probably conceive, for, to form a just idea, it were necessary to be on the spot. for some days past, there has been little less, than a famine in camp. a part of the army has been a week, without any kind of flesh, and the rest for three or four days. naked and starving as they are, we cannot enough admire the incomparable patience and fidelity of the soldiery, that they have not been ere this excited by their sufferings, to a general mutiny or dispersion. strong symptoms, however, discontent have appeared in particular instances; and nothing but the most acitive efforts every where can long avert so shocking a catastrophe.” what’s the central idea?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:10
In writing about her findings in a brazilian shantytown, nancy scheper-hughes’s account of alto do cruzeiro provides a window into the terrible toll of nonconsensual organ harvesting among the poor, as well as how she herself changed over time. how might an anthropologist justify the publication of this ethnographic research when considering the problem of ethnographic authority? a. all of the poor must be given an equal voice, thus polyvocality is justification. b. anthropologists are themselves changed in fieldwork, and so honest reflexivity is justification. c. the horrific conditions made it impossible to ignore, and since she obtained informed consent, this is justification. d. authoritative writing asks us to consider what right we have to report, thus a moral challenge is justification.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:30
What can you conclude about the information given here ? a)juveniles must testify in court b)adults are held to a lower standard c)the state guarantees that juveniles have legal rights much like those of adults d) punishment for juveniles violators are much more strict than those for adults
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which sentence best compares these two points of view? Cobb thinks they should support the Union; S...
Questions
question
English, 22.10.2020 05:01
question
Mathematics, 22.10.2020 05:01
question
Mathematics, 22.10.2020 05:01
question
Mathematics, 22.10.2020 05:01
question
Mathematics, 22.10.2020 05:01
question
English, 22.10.2020 05:01
question
Mathematics, 22.10.2020 05:01