The Bill of Rights protects important freedoms of American citizens, and also prohibits (prevents) the government from certain actions. Choose ALL things the U. S. Government is not allowed to do based on the Bill of Rights.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The things the U.S. Government is not allowed to do based on the Bill of Rights are the following.

Under the Bill of Rights, that is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, the federal government can't do the following things.

The 1st Amendment prohibits the government to interfere with the freedoms of the US citizens  We are talking about the freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and freedom to profess the religion you want

The 2nd Amendment prohibits the government to seize weapons that are in your home for self-protection. You have the right to bear guns.

The 3rd Amendment prohibits the government to force to keep soldiers in your home.

The 4th Amendment prohibits the government to search your house or private property without a valid reason.

The 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th Amendments guarantee that you have a proper legal proceeding if you are accused, prohibiting the government to arrest you before having a fair trial. The government cannot try twice for the same offense. You have the right to sue the process granted by the United States Constitution.

The 9th Amendment says that you also have other rights, not only the ones listed in the Bill of Rights.

The 10th Amendment prohibits the federal government to mess with the sovereign of the states.

Based on the bill of rights, the answers are A, D, and E.

Explanation:

-Government cannot stop citizens from sharing their opinions

-Government also cannot stop citizens from going to church

-Finally, government cannot force people to go to prison without the due process.

answer; i do believe that the correct answer is (punch card ballots);

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.