Sorry wrong number questions pls help im stuck 5. Lines 110–125: What details in these lines describe what the audience sees onstage?

6. Lines 176–182: Which stage directions reveal how Mrs. Stevenson feels? Why might she feel that way?

Wipes forehead, looks at window, bridles herself. She is starting to think if she is the victim

7. Lines 194–200: Tell about Mrs. Stevenson’s conflict and her attempts to resolve it.

8. Lines 235–266: What ideas do you have about why rising action is a fitting term to describe what is happening in these lines?

9. Lines 289–304: What does the audience see as Mrs. Stevenson dials the phone?

10. Lines 337–349: What words show Duffy’s reaction to Mrs. Stevenson’s call? What effect does the dramatist want to create?

11. Lines 384–405: What is Mrs. Stevenson revealing to the audience as she speaks to Duffy?

12. Line 401: Use the context of surrounding words to determine the meaning of invalid. What does this word suggest about how Mrs. Stevenson perceives herself?

13. Lines 415–439: Which words show what Duffy is doing? What do his actions reveal about him?

14. Lines 487–498: What can you infer about Mrs. Stevenson that she herself doesn’t seem to realize?

15. Lines 537–539: What is the sound effect in these lines? What is its significance?

16. Lines 535, 557, 562: What does the word whimper suggest about Mrs. Stevenson?

17. Lines 567–581: Describe the new obstacle Mrs. Stevenson encounters in these lines and how she handles it.

18. Lines 656–665: What new obstacle is presented in these lines?

19. Lines 683–689: Which words convey emotion in these lines?

20. Lines 759–795: How does this dialogue build suspense?

21. Lines 821–837: How are audiences probably reacting at this point in the play?

22. Lines 850–871: Why is this the climax of the play?

23. Lines 895–898: What does George say and do at the resolution of the plot? What is ironic about that remark and action?

the anasazi indians were real pioneers and created roads and irrigation systems for watering their crops. they were also great architects and the cliff dwellings are one of their biggest achievements.

explanation:

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: