INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 100 POINTS PLEASE HELP The Vietnam War (1955–75) involved armed conflict between North Vietnam and South Vietnam. The north was supported by communist countries, such as the Soviet Union and China. South Vietnam’s allies were the United States, South Korea, Australia, and other anticommunist states. How might historians and philosophers differ in their explanation of the causes and consequences of this conflict?

Many people had different and strong opinions about the Vietnam war. Some people completely disapproved of having the war on ethic and moral ground, and that could lead them to have a bias against the United states for getting involved. Others may be upset that it was a Proxy war and the United States and the USSR used Vietnam to test each other. Where a person is from may also affect how someone would explain the causes and consequences of this.

Explanation: I hope that was okay! Good luck! :D

texas governor sam houston opposed secession, but was unable to prevent it. in this speech, given prior to lincoln's election, he presents the argument that slavery would be safer within the united states than outside of it. it was a prescient argument, and one held by several other southern leaders.

have a good day pls vote me brailyest

answer; a client who is similar to you;