POINTS!HURRY PLEASE HELP!!When you answer say the part then the answer to that part Part A

A: Based on the details in "'Equal Justice Under Law': Thurgood Marshall," what can be inferred about how children responded to segregation?

B: Because they had other transportation options, black and white children refused to ride on segregated buses.

C: Most children adopted their parents' attitudes about race.

D: Unlike the adults around them, black and white children were more accepting of one another.

Most children were unaffected because their parents won lawsuits to end segregation.

Question 2

Part B

Which evidence from the text best supports the answer to Part A?

A: "The children said the white dolls were 'nice' and 'pretty.'”

B: “'They separate and go to different schools,' he said, 'and they come out and they play together.'”

C: "The parents took the all-white school board to court, hoping to win a decent education for their children."

D: "White children rode buses to modern brick schools with libraries and playgrounds."

Water and soil are brought into the indus river valley as a result of a. high winds b. annual floods c. long droughts d. seasonal tornadoes

In a democracy, this is held by the citizens who elect leaders to political office

Two police officers stopped a car for a minor traffic violation. while one of the officers dealt with the driver and the traffic violation, the other officer talked with the passenger. seeking to question the passenger about gang involvement, but lacking reasonable suspicions of criminal activity, the officer ordered the passenger out of the car. as the passenger exited the car, the officer saw a bulge in the passenger's coat which the officer suspected might be a gun. upon patting down the passenger, the officer felt the handle of a revolver and removed the gun. the passenger, who was a convicted felon, was charged with the possession of a gun by a prohibited possessor. prior to trial, the defendant sought to suppress the gun as evidence, contending that its seizure was unconstitutional. should the court suppress the gun as evidence? ayes, because, since the car had been stopped for a traffic violation, the officer could not order the passenger, who had not committed the violation, to exit the car. byes, because, since the officer lacked reasonable suspicion that the passenger was engaged in criminal activity, the officer could not pat down the passenger. cno, because a valid traffic stop gives an officer the right to pat down a passenger. dno, because the gun was discovered as a consequence of a valid terry stop and frisk.