subject
Social Studies, 19.10.2019 02:00 alannadiaz1

Psychologists would call the the point when a person has decided on a coping strategy for a potentially stressful situation.

secondary appraisal

fight-or-flight response

stress reaction

primary appraisal

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:30
This is the mountain range known as the alps. which of these statements regarding the alps is true? a) the alps are the largest mountain range in asia. b) the alps protect the roman empire from invasion. c) the alps were key in preventing england from being conquered in warfare. d) the alps prevented the roman empire from taking control of most of europe.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:30
8. select a supreme court case that has been particularly important in protecting civil liberties in the united states. in a three-paragraph essay, describe the case and the ruling, then explain how the case demonstrates why it is important that the supreme court is: a. protected from political or public pressure (since justices are appointed rather than elected and serve lifetime terms) b. able to change its interpretations of the law over time (10 points)
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:00
Crime affects the economy which which two primary ways? a financially and monetarily b non-financially and industrially c microeconomic and macroeconomic d spiritually and emotionally
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Psychologists would call the the point when a person has decided on a coping strategy for a potenti...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 26.03.2020 05:39